Subscribe |
|
By David Heras
Many of us have heard the argument: “The Gospels don’t report the true history of Jesus of Nazareth. The Gospels were written years after His death. Because of this, they are filled with mere rumors and fables.”
The explanation seems to make sense. After all, we have all played that childhood game of “telephone.” You get 20 of your closest friends that are under the age of 10. The first person whispers a message into his or her neighbor’s ear. Each player passes along the message until it reaches the end of the circle. By that time, the message has completely changed into silly nonsense. If a simple sentence can be miscommunicated in such a small amount of time, surely the same thing happened with the Gospels.
Sadly, most people don’t take enough time to consider the obvious flaws in this logic. The writers of the Gospels weren’t 10, and they weren’t whispering. Instead, they were researching and writing. The message they delivered wasn’t a silly sentence, but a message that could literally cost them their lives. The “telephone” metaphor just doesn’t apply here.
When we look at the Gospels, we see that the dates for their writing aren’t that distant from the actual events. For example, Merrill F. Unger of Dallas Theological Seminary dated the Gospel of Luke at 61 AD and the Gospel of Matthew at 45 AD at the latest. Now most historians believe that Jesus was born between the years 6 BC and 4 BC. This means that, at the very latest, Luke was written only about 34 years after the death of Jesus, and Matthew was written a mere 18 years after Jesus’ death. Therefore, the question we need to ask ourselves is whether this is enough time for crazy rumors, legends, and exaggerations to develop.
The answer is, of course it’s enough time! However, the better question is whether 18 or 34 years is enough time for credible rumors to develop. Is it enough time, for example, for rational people to say that they saw a beloved dead man alive and to convince others of the fact?
Which brings me to Elvis Presley. Elvis, the King of Rock and Roll, was born in 1935 in Tupelo, Mississippi, and he died on August 16, 1977, in Memphis, Tennessee. That makes it almost 33 years since his death.
Now whether or not you are a big Elvis fan, you probably know that there have been plenty of rumors about the King. Many eyewitnesses claim that Elvis faked his death, and that he is indeed alive. If we believe Luke’s accounts that Jesus lived on after his death, why shouldn’t we believe the claims of Elvis witnesses? Isn’t believing in one just like believing in the other?
Good question. Let’s compare:
Five Reasons Why We Can Believe that Elvis is Dead.
Five Reasons Why We Can Believe that Jesus Rose from the Dead.
So what does this show us? Mainly this: the idea that the Gospel accounts are merely exaggeration, rumor, and fable do not stand up to scrutiny. Belief in the resurrection of Jesus Christ is both logical and rational.
In other words, Elvis may have left the building, but Jesus left the tomb.
David is a husband, father, writer, high school teacher, and very small-time actor.
Post Your Comments |
Comments powered by the Website Comments System ® v1.0